|
Phyllis's Page ("PJT") ( "The Phyllisian Truth" ) ( www.terrific-tabs.com ) Last revision: 9/01; 2/02; 4/02; 10/02; 12/02; 1/03; 1/04; 11/04; 5/05; 10/5/05 CLICK HERE to go to the "FRONT PAGE" of "The Doctor's Terrific Tablets" CLICK HERE for ALPHABETICAL INDEX of this entire WEBSITE CLICK HERE to EMAIL your thoughts to the author ( jtoddiii@bellsouth.net ) |
|
|
|

PJT at age 3, with her
Mother
%202x3.gif)
PJT at age
16

PJT at age 20
|
About my dear wife, Phyllis J. Todd: One day recently, at a late supper, I was laboriously expounding on a favorite subject, at the dinner-table. Only my wife was in attendance with me. I looked across the table at my wife. I thought she was nodding approval of the brilliance of my tirade. Then, I looked more closely at my "bride" (of 46 years).... and I detected that she was lightly dozing, eyes gently closed. I discovered that what I had considered to be her "nodding'" of acquiescence, was indeed the repeated forward collapsing of my wife's head on her chest.... as she sat across from me.... and snoozed. |
|
My Phyllee A POEM by PJT's husband, John N. Todd III Composed 7/2/01; posted here 11/19/04; "doctored" slightly 10/5/05 It was many and many a year ago In our kingdom on the lea, That a maiden there lived Whom you many know, By the name of "PJT". She was a child, And I was full-grown.... So I asked this "Dear Pearl" To be my own -- Just for me.... mine alone. I now call this beauty "My Phyllee".... And, after 42 years -- plus three, (In our "Kingsway" on the lea) She still belongs to me. She has lived.... and lives 'til now.... With no other thought, Than to love, and be loved by.... me. Just PJT -- with JNT. By: John (Edgar-Allen) Todd (7/2/01) |
|
7/8/98 8/13/01 My wife, Phyllis J. Todd (a Registered Nurse), asked me to put into our "Website" the 3 cardinal "rules" of medical therapy. She and I have noted, through the years, that these "rules" can apply not only to "medical" treatment, but also to other problems and challenges -- that all of us may "bump-into", from time to time -- in "life". In addition, there is a "fourth rule" -- I call it "The PJT Rule" -- which PJT began to incorporate into our thought-processes, years ago, whenever we considered "decision-making", on any serious subject. We feel that these "rules" can be useful to everyone -- in a variety of LIFE'S circumstances. |
Rules of "treatment" (1.) "First, do no harm." (Prima, non nocere.) (2.) If what you're doing is succeeding -- continue it. (3.) If what you are doing is not accomplishing what you require -- do something different. (4.) ("The PJT Rule") Don't "do something, just to be doing something". Sometimes, there is nothing else that can be done. It is most important to recognize that point.... when that point has been reached. 5. AVOID the "Do-something-even-if-it's-wrong" attitude. |
|
DOCTRINISM
(Doctrinal Rigidity) Isaiah 29: 13 (NRSV) The Lord said: Because these people draw near with their mouths and honor me with their lips, while their hearts are far from me, and their worship of me is a human commandment..... learned by rote; 14 so I will again do amazing things with this people, shocking and amazing. The wisdom of their wise shall perish.... and the discernment of the discerning shall be hidden. I say that whenever a "religion" or a church-doctrine claims to have deciphered the "one way" (the "only way") to be accepted by God.... then God Himself has been "by-passed", or circumvented. If God cannot "save" any individual He chooses to save.... regardless of that individual's church affiliation; and regardless of human approval or disapproval.... then God has effectively surrendered His sovereignty to human-beings. (Surely, no one believes that the restrictive doctrine of a church-of-men can supercede the will of God. See link Chosen by God.) (See also: Some call it "The Great Commission".) Another question for the reader: Are your spiritual beliefs the same now as they were 5 years ago?.... or 10 years ago? Is your doctrine as "fixed" as it was in your younger years.... based on what you were told, then, to believe? Are you not now less "frozen" in your spiritual conclusions? Don't you now "appraise" your understanding of life and spiritual matters with a more contemplative and "informed" attitude? Don't you now ask yourself more questions.... without depending on someone else to dictate their opinion of what your faith "should" be? Haven't you "evolved" in your understanding of God.... as you have aged, and studied, and prayed, and listened, and learned.... and as you have been led-along, by God, in God's own timing and mechanisms of enlightening you? If you are honest with yourself, I'll wager that you will agree that you have "matured" in your beliefs, and that superstitions have decreased; and that Santa-Clausian opinions have been revised. My understanding is that "religious" maturing is a lifelong process for each of God's people (link).... and always under God's own oversight, guidance.... and revelation. What do you say? I conclude that God claims or "accepts" those who satisfy Him -- according to God's criteria, and God's Doctrine -- for God's own reasons.... reasons that we humans cannot now fully know -- or understand. "It is all God's doing". Ultimately, all will agree.... the ONLY WAY to get to God, is through God.... not through a specific church, or by recitation of a creed, or because of a personal promise, or because of certain "deeds".... or because of "baptism". Repeating from above: JAMES 4: 12 There is one Lawgiver and Judge who is able to save, and to destroy. So who, then, are you to judge your neighbor? |
|
"BAPTISTS hope to convert JEWS" The following essay, by John and Phyllis Todd, was printed in its entirety in "The Tuscaloosa News", in June 1996, in response to a lengthy Tuscaloosa News opinion-piece which stated that "The Baptists" wanted to "convert the Jews".... to Christianity. Click HERE for Easy-Print format of this essay We Methodists love the "Southern Baptists" -- but sometimes the zeal and fervor of the Baptists may seem, to us "outsiders", to be a bit "pushy". Last year, after their annual convention, the "Southern Baptists" adopted a resolution apologizing to the Black citizens of America for 200 years of mistreatment of Blacks -- presumably by American Baptists. Before that, in 1993, an article entitled "Baptists count the lost", appeared in a Birmingham newspaper. The gist of that article was that the Alabama Baptists had counted the "Christian" church-goers (the "saved") in Alabama, and subtracted that number from Alabama's total population -- and had come up with a huge number of Alabamians that the Baptists decided were "lost". At that time, many of us non-Baptist "believers" smiled at the smugness of a doctrinal church that would arrogate to itself the authority to decide, for God, who is "saved", and who is "lost" -- based on the Baptists' presumption that their interpretation of what God has allowed us humans to understand, is correct -- and the Baptists' belief that all other denominations and religions are wrong, in the sight of God..... and hence "lost", and excluded from God's favor. Now this: recent articles in the New York Times and in the Tuscaloosa News report that at the 1996 annual convention of Southern Baptists, a resolution was passed "calling for efforts to convert Jews to Christianity". The Baptist "domestic missionary agency has appointed a missionary to undertake such work." The plan, according to the article, is to "direct our energies and resources toward the proclamation of the Gospel -- to the Jews." Jewish spokespeople have responded predictably, with remarks like, "The Baptists should talk about a mission to the Christians, because it was in Christian Europe that the holocaust occurred." A rabbi speaking for the American Jewish Committee on interreligious affairs is quoted as saying, "Singling out Jews as a target for conversion is a great disservice to Christian-Jewish relations." My reason for writing this response is to pose a few questions for readers of the Tuscaloosa News, as follows: Is the Baptist "Christian" doctrinal variation correct, in the eyes of God? Are Baptists the only ones who are accurate in their interpretation of the Bible -- and the "truth" of God? If so, should the rest of us then conclude that, for example, the Roman Catholics are "left out"? What about the Presbyterians, the "Mormons", the "Eastern Orthodox" Church, the Church of Christ, or the "Assembly of God"? Are some of these church-groups "in" -- and the others "out? Is there a solitary doctrine that God accepts.... to the exclusion of all others? What about various alternative "Protestant" doctrines? Are those of the Arminian persuasion correct in their beliefs? If so, are the followers of Calvin, or Luther wrong.... and thus omitted from the salvation that comes from God (link)? The readers of this article, and I, may think that we know the answer to the next question, but I will ask it anyway: Are the Muslims, the world's largest "religious" group (who are also "children of Abraham", and whose mantra is "There is but one God") irretrievably "lost".... because they do not agree with the Baptists? Here's the big question: Who are we humans to decide whom God can accept, or "choose" -- and "save"? Do human-beings have the authority to force our earthly restrictive "religious" doctrines on other humans -- or on God? (See link, "Doctrinal Rigidity".) I am not a Jew, and I am not a Baptist, but I can understand Jewish disdain when a non-Jewish organization tells the Jews what "religious" beliefs they should accept. Turn the insult around -- suppose the Jews told the Baptists that the Baptists are wrong, and that they should accept Jewish beliefs, and rites, and ceremonies. Can you just imagine how the Baptists would respond ! Many God-fearing "spiritually-minded" individuals would declare that it is God alone who decides who is acceptable to Him, and who will enter the Kingdom of God -- irrespective of the divergent opinions of humans.
I can only hope that God has accepted me, just as He created me.... and, "Just as I Am". If God can't get me into Heaven without my being a Baptist, I've got a problem.
|