|
TODD's TRUTH Personal opinions of the author -- concerning God, "religion", and the Bible. And, special messages and lessons for those who are "given" to me.
Selected from the on-going INTERNET BOOK, "The Doctor's Terrific Tablets" ( http://www.terrific-tabs.com (Link to Home Page) by John N. Todd III, M. D. (link; about the author)
SEE related link: The PURPOSE of this website And see on this page: Pictures of the author (link) Last "doctoring": 5/01; 7/01; 9/01; 2/02; 8/02; 10/02; 2/03; 3/03; 3/04; 9/04; 3/19/05; 4/05; 10/05; 11/05; 1/29/06 CLICK HERE to go to the "FRONT PAGE" of "The Doctor's Terrific Tablets" CLICK HERE for ALPHABETICAL INDEX of this entire WEBSITE CLICK HERE to EMAIL your thoughts to the author
|
|
|
|
|
![]() 1947 |
![]() JNT & PJT -- 1957 |
![]() 1957 |
![]() 1997 |
|
2/4/00 |
Science, God, and "religion" A paragraph copied from Letter to my niece -- about God and science. See link, for the entire tablet, in Easy-Print format. Is there any knowledgeable human-being, anywhere, who can honestly accept and believe as follows: "All matter, including living creatures, is simply an interaction of lifeless atoms and molecules -- following the "dictates" of an unexplained 'Big Bang'"? Are there really those of the same "scientific persuasion" who might also say, "Nothing really exists..... not even life, or consciousness, or joy, or fun -- or love." Would those same "scientists" say, "There are only physical principles, and chemical reactions." ( Linda, gimme a break! ) (I have often smiled with PJT about what a good job the "Big Bang" did in molding her cute molecules and atoms -- and about what a "big bang" she gives me!) Surely no engineer, or "scientist", would say, "There cannot be a God, because I cannot see Him." Dear goodness, how many previously "invisible" facts ("truths") have "come to light", to be "seen" (especially within the past 50 years)....... "truths" that no self-proclaimed "scientist" would ever have dreamed of (or "believed" in) -- if he had depended upon actual "visualization", before he could become "convinced". Do you know of any "scientist" who would say that humans "created" electricity, or that an "engineer" decided the "direction" that electrons flow; or that a mechanical genius invented the "inborn" electrical characteristics (piezo-currents) of "silicone chips"; or that the human mind manufactured fossil fuels, and designed the mechanical forces that internal combustion engines utilize? Did the "Big Bang" invent "light amplification by the stimulation of the emission of radiation" (L.A.S.E.R.) -- or did humans not simply discover and utilize what Almighty God Himself caused and created for the benefit of us human-beings? Did the mind of man generate the gravitational forces that control the orbits of satellites? How ludicrous the questions become! |
|
1/8/00 |
A paragraph from the chapter: The Kingdom of God (see link, for the full tablet in Easy-Print format)
|
|
1/4/00 |
Paragraph from Salvation is of the Lord (See link for the full tablet, in Easy-Print format) It is God alone, uninfluenced by any human's opinion, who decides about who will enter His Kingdom -- and who will thus receive "salvation". And it is God alone who determines when an individual, in his earthly journey, will be awakened to the truth of God -- and to the truth about God. God chooses His own. We humans do not choose God. Earthly human-beings do not cause God to come into existence when (or because) they "accept" God --- or because they agree to "allow" God to exert His power in their lives -- or because they "make a decision" to believe in Him, and trust Him. "From first to last, it is all God's doing." "Salvation is of the Lord." |
|
10/21/99 |
A paragraph from Faith without Works Contrary to what is sometimes taught, God's people are not all formed in the same "mold". My understanding is that God intended each of His people to be an individual -- to be different from all others -- to "minister" in various ways........ for God's own reasons, and for His plans. It is simply incorrect for anyone to conclude that all humans are created to fit into a solitary "cookie-cutter" configuration -- of a certain size and shape and color and function and thought -- all to "satisfy" the doctrinal views of one-or-the-other of the countless earthly "religious" groups. Nowadays, it is easy to get the impression from some "churches" -- and from some "denominations" -- and from certain ministers........ that the "organized church" expects all church-goers to "be", and think, and serve, and donate, and "work", and "do" -- in only one humanly-pre-determined way. How silly!...... If that were true, ALL of us would be "preachers", priests, nuns, monks, or missionaries! |
|
10/8/99 Closing paragraphs from Religianity and Churchianity So....... what do you say? Are you willing to abandon your own thoughts, and your personal spiritual decipherings -- and yield to the "pressure" and mandates of a specific doctrinal organization? Perhaps you are superstitiously afraid that your "internal" thoughts have led you to a set-of-beliefs which God considers to be unsatisfactory -- and that if you don't quickly "sign-up" with "this-church-or-that-church", you will be eternally "damned", and omitted forever from God's favor. If you feel that way -- GOOD LUCK -- and here's hoping that you select (and restrict yourself to) the sole doctrine and church that God "favors". (See link, Is there a God's Church?). My understanding is that God guides his accepted "children" into precisely the "beliefs" that God prefers -- and that a "child-of-God" begins to awaken at the exact time that God-the-Father has ordained. I am betting my life on this belief -- for now, and for the life-to-come. |
|
9-12-99 A paragraph copied from GOD'S TRUTH (See link) Is the "truth" about God fixed, and finite, and immutable -- in the "spiritual" world....... just as the "laws" of physics seem to be rigidly fixed, in the mechanical universe? Yes........ "the truth" of God's essence, and His attributes, and His purposes -- and His interaction with His people -- are "fixed", by God; and cannot be re-shaped according to the whims of humans....... or "revised" according to doctrinal variations and "claims". |
|
9-6-99 Closing paragraphs from Enemies of God I cannot find Biblical indication that a human individual can cause himself to become a Godsperson, or a "friend" of God -- by anything that individual "does", or says, or claims, or promises, or sacrifices, or gives, or joins, or "decides", or recites. Only God knows who is acceptable to God -- in His sight -- for His reasons. We humans, in or out of any "church", are not qualified to determine, or to identify, or to select, or to "approve"......... which ones of us have been accepted by God. |
|
9-1-99 A paragraph
from Children
of God -- Brothers of
Jesus |
|
Excerpted from The Faith OF Jesus (see link) 8-31-99 Also, it is critically significant (to me) to remember, and to emphasize, and to state-the-obvious -- that we who claim to be Christian "Godspeople" do not serve and worship two God's -- two "deities". There is only one God........ not a "God-God", plus a separate "Jesus-God". Therefore, it becomes apparent that the "beliefs" of Jesus ARE the "beliefs" of God...... the "Gospel" of God...... the "good news" from God -- taught by, and manifested through The Christ. (I hope you will go to the link to my "tablet": Jesus is God; God is Jesus -- and note the Biblical references, and their instruction.) Remember, too -- there is only one "gospel" -- not a gospel of Jesus, and another man-made "gospel" about Jesus -- and then a "Gospel of God". As for me -- since Jesus "preaches" and "proclaims" THE GOSPEL of God (link) -- I am satisfied that the "Gospel of God" is the one TRUE gospel. Yes...... there is only the "Gospel of God" -- the "good news" that was revealed to Jesus, and through Jesus -- by God -- and explained and exemplified by Jesus..... and then extrapolated by Paul, and others -- and portrayed to us as the "Faith OF Jesus". |
|
8-30-99 A paragraph copied from God's Spiritual Nation (see link to the full tablet) No..... the obvious Biblical fact is that God is totally free to select (accept) His own people....... from any continent, and from any race, and from any "denominational church", and from any nationality, and from any genetic stock -- without consideration of any human's opinion -- and without the assistance and approval of any earthly "group". It seems almost absurd to have to state the obvious -- but if you will simply look at the claims of some churches about the singular "correctness" of their own doctrine, and about "the truth" of their specific beliefs ...... and their rejection of the beliefs of other churches -- you will readily see why it is so important to re-emphasize this essential point: God does not depend upon any human, or any group of humans, to help Him decide about His acceptance, or rejection, of any earthly creature. (See this link to SALVATION is of the LORD.) |
|
8-10-99 A paragraph copied from GOD'S TRUTH (See link to the full tablet)
|
|
3/19/99 |
THINGS WE CAN LEARN FROM A DOG:
|
|
2/9/99 |
An oft-quoted remark by Thoreau: "If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer. Let him step to the music which he hears -- however measured -- or far away." |
|
1/22/99 -- A paragraph copied from "Enemies of God" So, I must say here, once again, that when I have questions about the "rightness" or "wrongness" of some "theory" about God, I go to the Bible of God. I must also re-state, here, my belief that if what you and I are taught in the Bible, about God, is erroneous -- then we have no real and true "source-book" to study, or to research. We have no reliable way to get "the answers". If we cannot trust the Bible, we are left with only the inventions of our own imaginations -- or the fantasies of philosophers, or the musings of physicists, or the make-believe of psychologists, or the home-made beliefs of various sects and denominations. (My intuition tells
me that Godspeople [God's People] "hear" and
"see" the message of the Bible; and that
they "believe" what they read..... even when
they do not fully understand the implications of some
Biblical statements -- or the reasons for certain
inclusions that are found in the Bible.) |
|
A paragraph about "The
Bible" -- from a chapter entitled "The
Sovereignty of
God"
|
The Sovereignty of God For those who sense and understand the truth of the Holy Bible...... "The Book of God"...... there is no need to speak of the validity of the statements about God, and about the "sovereignty" of God -- as revealed in the Bible. As I see it, the Bible is not simply a compendium of ethical axioms, which one may "accept" or "reject" according to his or her humanly "wisdom". God's word -- the Bible -- is either from God, and hence "true", and valid, and correct..... or it is simply an interesting man-made book of history, with certain postulates about a supreme-being, and about human nature, and "ethics". My belief is that there is no "in-between". (What do you say? Would you say that you may accept or reject the Bible, or certain parts of it, according to your "opinion" about the truth of God? I say not.) My conclusion, after a lifelong search for a "Gold Standard" about God, and about the truth concerning God -- is that "The Bible", alone, reveals the "truth" -- God's truth -- about Himself, and about His ways, and His plans, and His purposes. |
|
12/28/98 |
A paragraph from Responding to God (link) Don't you agree that each one of God's people does indeed awaken and "respond" to God at the exact moment, and in exactly the way, that the omniscient and omnipotent Creator dictates? If it is otherwise, then our worldly existence is truly in chaos -- and each of us, then, is left helplessly waiting for "Big Bang" to influence us -- or for frail sons-and-daughters-of-evolution to "show us the way"..... and we are left depending on rudderless mortal creatures to teach us, and to be our "role-models" (or, consider "soul-models") -- according to standards established by errant and ignorant and deceitful animal-minds. |
|
10-14-98 |
Paragraph from "Salvation is of the Lord" (linked) No...... it is God alone, uninfluenced by any human's opinion, who decides about who will enter His Kingdom -- and who will thus receive "salvation". And it is God alone who determines when an individual, in his earthly journey, will be awakened to the truth of God, and to the truth about God. God chooses His own. We humans do not choose God. Earthly human-beings do not cause God to come into existence when (or because) they "accept" God, or because they agree to allow God to exert His power in their lives, or because they "make a decision" to believe in Him -- and trust Him. "From first to last, it is all God's doing." "Salvation is of the Lord." |
|
10-12-98
"The Judgment" Summary remarks from "The
Judgment for God's People", a "tablet" from the internet
book: |
"The Judgment" -- Summary remarks, taken
from the full tablet: The
Judgment for God's
People |
|
Posted here 9-29-98; |
Letter to my brother, January 1994 (slightly "extrapolated", 9/98; 6/7/01) (Alton B. Todd, of Roswell Georgia) CLICK HERE for Easy-Print format of this letter Hi, Al.......We received you fax-response (yesterday) concerning my composition about "trust". PJT and I read your musings, with interest. A few comments will follow, below. Re: your thoughts expressed in your fax: 1. One big point: Godspeople ("God's people") are not "robots". They are "children of God", as portrayed repeatedly in the Bible. Earthly "children" are led, guided, protected, molded, pruned, disciplined -- by earthly "fathers" -- and God's "children" are "managed" similarly, by "God-the-Father". Phyllis and I analogize our human "free-will", in the sight of God, to the "freedom" that a young child has in the "playroom". That human child is "free" to do whatever he chooses, go where he wants, play with any toy -- so long as he doesn't violate his Mama's orders. If he breaks her rules, he is immediately re-directed, and possibly "disciplined". The mother watches the child, protects him, instructs him, etc., very much like God does with His "children" (the called, the chosen, the elect, the "righteous", the "saved", the accepted, etc.). Similarly, a kid at school -- a student. He or she is allowed to believe that he has "free-will" -- but does he? Or is he almost totally under the control of the teacher? Does not the teacher make all the significant decisions, and bring the student along -- according to her wisdom, and her plan-of-instruction? The same concerning "servants". Servants of human-masters are trained and instructed about how to do, and to "be". They are allowed "free-will", within the parameters allowed by the "Master". If the servant does not function properly, he is brought-into-line, by "The Master". So, you see, Godspeople are not "robots" -- they (we) are children, students, servants (and "sheep"; and "good trees" -- and other similar analogies). 2. Concerning your "question" about whether Godspeople can sit back, and do nothing -- except passively "trust" in God -- I would say that for Godspeople that scenario is totally impossible. I perceive that a Godsperson does indeed labor and sweat and agonize, and all the things you suggest -- in the precise way that he was created to function. In a Godsperson, all of the intended characteristics are innate ("given") attributes that occur by "plan" -- because of the way that each individual has been "designed" by God. To analogize again (paraphrasing Jesus's remarks about "good trees" and "bad trees"), a tree must bear what it was made to bear. (See link: Fruits and deeds; weeds and creeds.) A tree must "be" what is was created to be. An apple tree will bear what God considers to be "good fruit" -- apples, as specified by the Creator. It will never bear pears (even though God considers pears, likewise, to be "good fruit"). (Interestingly, "pear-trees" and "apple-trees" disagree with each other as to which "fruit" is most desirable to God -- and "fig-trees" consider only "figs" to be acceptable -- to God.) Nevertheless..... for this discussion, God considers a "pear" to be a good "fruit", borne by a "good tree" -- "designed" to bear pears. If any "good tree" does not bear what it was assigned to bear, it will be pruned, fertilized, re-planted, dug-up, moved, or otherwise altered -- by the "Chief Gardener" -- so that the intended "fruit" will be produced, in adequate amounts. 3. Many of God's individuals are born not with beautiful bodies, and great brains, and white skin -- but quite the opposite. Surely you have known many "simple", plain, ordinary people who have great spiritual understanding, and genuine faith (yes, "trust"). No one can possibly believe that all of God's people are beautiful, and materially successful, and healthy. We all should remember one of the great Biblical admonitions (1 Corinthians 15: 19): "If it for this world only that the Christ has given us hope, then we of all people are most to be pitied." That is to say -- this world (this"life") is not the entire purpose for our individual existences. (Later, I will send you another "writing" on my understanding of the Kingdom of God (see link) I do not know why there are inequities in this world. I do not know why wars are allowed to take place, and why tornadoes occur, and why cancers develop in some people. My "faith" tells me that there is purpose in everything that happens. That "purpose" may not be evident to us "humans". If I believe the Bible (and I do), then there are chosen individuals, and there are other individuals who are created as "vessels made for destruction". Yes, God has enemies (link); and God destroys His enemies; and God protects His people from their enemies (not only human "enemies" -- but also spiritual enemies -- including spiritual ignorance). 4. One last point, then I will let your brain rest, for now. PJT and I do not understand that we humans "put our trust in God". Everything that we have deciphered from the Bible says that the "putting of faith" is by God -- from God, into His people. Faith is a gift from God -- (see link). Faith cannot be manufactured, or pretended, or simply "tried". As John Calvin said, in "Institutes of Christian Religion": "If, at any time, we are troubled at the small number of those who believe, let us remember that no one can understand the mysteries of God, except those to whom it is given." Enough for now. See if
you can make any sense of all this. |
|
9-23-98 "Save your good advice for those who can use it." A physician friend of mine, in the USAF, in 1963, quoted this remark to me several times -- concerning the futility of trying to get some individuals to understand certain "medical" advice -- or other "pearls" of wisdom, and truth. |
|
9-17-98 A paragraph from the "Tablet" -- Children of God (link) |
A personal point: the "children of God" are not "robots", or God's "puppets" -- as I have heard certain church-goers frivolously state. No.... God's children are God's individual human-beings -- each under the constant watchful eye of God -- being guided and guarded and protected and molded and developed and instructed and disciplined and loved.... precisely like a loving and caring Mother and Father "raise", and guard, and teach, and train their own offspring. |
|
8-21-98 John Calvin, in "The Institutes of Christian Religion", chapter 7, says: "Since God has chosen to reserve the treasure of true wisdom for His children, it is not surprising that there is so much ignorance and stupidity in the majority of men...... If, at any time, we are troubled at the small number of those who believe, let us remember that no one can understand the mysteries of God except those to whom it is given." |
|
7-11-98
Copied from the chapter
of this book: (from |
"Spiritual Laws" compared with "Physical Laws"
(I have previously analogized the "spiritual truth" about God, with the truth and the effect of the physical laws of the mechanical universe. The "Law of Gravity", for example, [let's call it, here, the "Truth of Gravity] does not wait upon an individual's acceptance, before gravity can become effective in that individual's life. That is, "gravity" does not become true and valid and effective just because you "choose" to believe it; and it does not wait to become effective until you have made up your mind to accept it! Neither does the "Truth of Gravity" go away, or become ineffective, simply because your humanly brain cannot understand it; or because you decide not to "accept" it; or because you change your opinion, and decide that it is not believable.) And so it is with "spiritual truth". The truth is true, whether or not you, or anyone else, believes and accepts the truth. An individual's profession of doubt or unbelief does not negate "the truth". |
|
6-21-98 |
"The Way of the World" by Ella Wheeler Wilcox Laugh, and the world laughs with you, Weep, and you weep alone; For the brave old earth must borrow its mirth, But has trouble enough of its own. Sing, and the hills will answer, Sigh, it is lost on the air; The echoes rebound to a joyful sound -- And shrink from voicing care. Rejoice, and men will seek you -- Grieve, and they turn and go. They want full measure of your pleasure; But they do not want your woe. Be glad, and your friends are many, Be sad -- and you lose them all. There is none to decline your nectared wine, But alone you must drink life's gall. Feast, and your halls are crowded, Fast, and the world goes by. Forget and forgive -- it helps you to live; But no man can help you to die. There is room in the halls of pleasure For a long and lordly train; But one by one, we must all march on Through the narrow isle of pain. |
|
Posted 5-12-98 Slightly
revised 12/27/99;
"The
Church"
|
"The CHURCH" -- What do YOU
mean when you say, "The CHURCH"?
"The church". What does the word "church" refer to? What does it mean? The derivation of the word, according to the dictionary, is from root-words meaning "The Lord's house", or the "Master's house". How is the word "church" used in the Bible? (I cannot find reference to the word "church" in the Old Testament. Perhaps the comparable word in the Old Testament is "temple", or "sanctuary", or "tabernacle".) There are many references to "the church" in the New Testament, especially in the writings of Paul. Many times, the term "church of God" is used. Jesus used the word "church" several times. What about later
writings -- even now in modern times -- in articles
about God, and the Bible, and "religion", and "the church"?
To what "church" is an author referring, when he uses the
term "the church"? What "church" are you referring
to, when you say "the church"? Do you mean your
own local denominational church? Do you mean the
church building, the "house of the Lord"? When the
Baptists speak of "the church", are they referring to
the same "church" that the "Catholics" claim? And, contrariwise, is it essential, in the eyes of God, that God's people necessarily "belong" to any earthly, humanly institutional "church", in order to gain -- and retain -- favor with Almighty God. That is, does simply "joining" some denominational church, or any institutional church, "automatically" confer upon an individual the right to consider himself to be included among "God's people"? Some of these questions become absurd ! (Repeating
my "definition" of "the church"): I
consider the "church", the true church, to be the
"aggregation" of God's people -- the
"company", or "body", or "army", of those individuals who
have been accepted ("chosen", saved, claimed) by God,
to be His own -- those whom God
has found acceptable, in His sight, for His
own reasons ...... regardless of where these
individuals may live; and regardless of the
doctrinal or denominational church to which
they may "belong".
My understanding -- my belief -- is that the choice of who is, or who will become, one of God's people, and a "member" of God's "church", is totally and unequivocally and irrevocably a decision made by God alone, for God's own reasons. That "decision" occurs at a time specified by God, and is not left up to the paltry understanding or "choice" of a human-being. No humanly or earthly denominational church need necessarily be involved (although a "church" may be a part of the instruction and preparation of an individual, for God). I believe
that a person becomes aware of the truth of
God, after being led and instructed in life, by
God Himself. That individual
awakens to his "calling" at a time and place designed
beforehand by God, in order to fulfill the plans and
purposes and pleasure of God.
My
understanding, based on what I "see" and "hear" in
the Bible, is that the will and effort and choice and
"decision" of an individual human are not a part of
the process of being chosen (accepted) by
God. Read the following scriptures, out loud:
Which of today's numerous doctrinal churches is "right". What human-beings, including ministers and priests and rabbis, are qualified to decide which "doctrine" is "spiritually correct", in the opinion of Almighty God? Are all "Christian" churches partly correct in their "doctrines"? Are the beliefs of the Jewish "church" totally wrong, and are all Jews therefore condemned, in the sight of God? What about the "Sons of Ishmael"? Has any human been appointed by God to judge and condemn them? Is it enough that a "member" of a given denominational church simply claim to believe and accept the doctrine of that particular church, in order to be "saved", and so to become a "Christian" -- a member of the "church of God's people"? Would some "churches" say that it is enough for a member simply to satisfy himself, or the preacher, or the board of deacons, in order to become acceptable to God? Can an individual "write his own ticket", and declare himself acceptable to God -- and so become "saved"? Would some say that God becomes "satisfied" if a potential "member" simply recites a creed, or if that individual is "baptized"? Surely everyone would agree that it is God, alone, who must be satisfied with an individual, and with that individual's "beliefs", and "faith", and "trust" -- and that an individual's acceptance by Almighty God is unrelated to his being "accepted" or included by any human-being, or by any group of humans, or by a "church". Note the following three references, concerning "the church" set up by man:
|
|
Posted
|
"The Religious Right" An opinion-piece by Dr. John N. Todd (Published in Tuscaloosa News, June 1994) CLICK HERE to see this "tablet" in Easy-Print format You're in trouble, nowadays, if you consider yourself to be "religious". If you go to church, or read the Bible, or claim to be a Christian; or if you believe in God -- congratulations -- you're now a "member" of the "religious right". You're belittled by the talk-shows, and you're denigrated by the big-time newspaper writers. By implication, you are ignorant, docile, weak, and "Southern". You're a church-going fundamentalist, and a "fanatic". You're a bigot and a "homophobe"; and Jesse Helms is your political role-model. Furthermore, you've been duped by Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell into believing whatever they say; and you've been helplessly bamboozled into voting in exactly the way they dictate. If you're among the "religious right", you should be ashamed, because you haven't yet abandoned your antiquated "churchy" ideas, and because you haven't yet adopted the tenets of the "un-religious left". You must change, and get with the new dogma -- from the Council of Clinton. As Southerners, you and I must re-mold ourselves, so that we can become more like our enlightened leaders in Washington D.C. Just think, maybe you and I can evolve, and begin to think and act more like Donna Shalala, Joycelyn Elders. Robert Reich, Janet Reno -- and Hillary. Now suppose you want to resign your affiliation with the "religious right" -- here's what you've got to do: First, you must abandon your dilapidated system of values and virtues. You'll have to forsake all that silly superstitious stuff about God and prayer and the Bible. Surely, then, you will begin to realize that your real creator was Father Big-Bang, and that Mother Nature is responsible for all the miracles and mysteries of the Universe. When you accept Big-Bang as your creator, you will then awaken to recognize "the truth" -- that human life and love and "values" do not actually exist -- and that we humans are only chemical aggregations of atoms and electrons -- the result of unexplained, unplanned, random, evolutional chaos. Furthermore, if you no longer want to be categorized with the "religious right", you must surrender your prejudiced opinions about "diversity". You must alter your antique attitudes toward single-sex marriages, and "gay" families. You must embrace the idea of "gays" in the military. You must realize that pregnancy for unwed teenage mothers is now an acceptable "alternative" -- and that abortion-on-demand is an entitlement. Get with it! Devote your misguided attention to the "ozone layer", and to global warming -- and to concern about the population of the spotted owl, the snail darter, and the sturgeon. Now, here are my personal feelings: The degrading attacks on the "religious right" are actually attacks on "religion" (faith and trust in God). An attack on "religion" is really an attack on the very roots and foundation of the United States. And, most important -- to belittle religion is to belittle and ridicule God -- and that cannot possibly be effective. We humans, individually and collectively, should devoutly hope and pray that we are -- and will be -- included among the "religious right", in the opinion of God. Whether our human cohorts consider you and me to be right or wrong, conservative or liberal, does not really matter. It is better to be "spiritually right", than to be "politically correct". Better to be among the "religious right", than to be among the "un-religious wrong". Better to be included with the "religious right", than to be grouped with the "un-religious" -- whether "left" or "right". Don't all of us docile-and-dumb, Southern, church-going conservative "fanatics" hope that we are "religiously" right, with God! Remember this: religious truth does not change. Faith and honor and spiritual values will always be the same. And, God is the same -- yesterday, today, and forever!
|
|
|
QUESTION: Is there a specific doctrinal church -- A "God's Church" -- that God accepts -- in preference to ALL others? Click HERE for Easy-Print format of this title (This is an essay by John and Phyllis Todd. This was written in response to two articles that appeared in the Tuscaloosa News.) We feel sorry for all of us church-going "Christians" who do not "belong" to the Catholic Church, or to the Church of Christ. Apparently, a recent writer to the Tuscalosa News believes that her church, the Roman Catholic Church, is the one "true" church; and another writer believes that the Church of Christ represents the sole aggregation of individuals whom God has accepted. Presumably, the implication of each of these two writers is that those who do not "belong" to their church -- that is, the church that each of these writers considers to be God's one "chosen" denominational church -- are irretrievably left out of God's favor; and hence are destined -- not to "salvation", and to the Kingdom of God -- but doomed to eternal exclusion from God. Gee, don't we Protestants wish that we had not listened to the spiritual mandates of our parents, or to the messages of God's Bible, or to what we were taught from the words and examples of God-Incarnate -- and don't we wish that we had ignored the pleas of our own doctrinal church.... so that we might have signed-up with the "right" church, and memorized their rules and regulations, and recited their "correct" creed, and knelt before their altars -- instead of going astray with they call our "erroneous" beliefs. Many of us Christian "Godspeople" consider God's "true church" to be the aggregation of God's people (linked) -- the "company" or "body" of those individuals who have been claimed ("chosen") by God to be His own.... those whom God has found acceptable, according to His own criteria -- wherever these "accepted" individuals are.... and to whatever denominational church they may "belong". But no, we "outsiders" are being told that we are misguided in our spiritual understanding, and in our choice of "churches". We are led to believe that our "righteousness", before God, is determined by our church affiliation. "They" seem to say that we humans are "justified" and "saved".... not by God alone.... but by God PLUS a specific institutional church. It's scary out here in this world, when you discover that, according to certain churchy human-beings -- you're condemned because you "joined" the wrong church. Fortunately, however, my Bible does give me a little hope, as follows:
|
9/15/99 "Doctrinal
Rigidity" Rigid
DOCTRINISM" Which one of the world's countless
"religious" doctrines is correct, and
"true"...... in the eyes of God? How do you
and I know whether (or not) we are pleasing and satisfying
God, in what we claim to believe. Are "the others" wrong --
those "others" who do not believe as we believe -- and are
they therefore not satisfying God -- and are they hence
omitted from the "benefits" that come with God's
"favor".
1/6/00
8/10/02
From the book:
"The Doctor's
Terrific Tablets"
(Doctrinal Rigidity)
Click
HERE for EASY-PRINT format of this entire
"tablet"
Which one of the numerous
"religious" doctrines should you accept? Whom
should you consult, for your "decision" -- your parents,
your "church", your pastor or priest, your friends?
Should you study the great religions, and the great
preachers of old -- and thereby try to "design" a system
that will help you to be spiritually comfortable -- and
religiously correct? Or, should you just give up, and not
seriously believe anything -- since you feel that
you haven't been able to decipher the mind of God?
Which way do you turn when humanly "wisdom" doesn't give
you all the answers -- and when "pretend" belief, and
superstitious "hope", do not satisfy you?
I have been led to ask myself these questions, once again,
recently, because of the "current events" of today (1/96);
specifically, the hateful circumstances in what used to be
"Yugoslavia" -- and more specifically, the chronic war in
what is now (January 1996) called "Bosnia-Herzegovina" -- a
war between Croatia, "Serbia", and the Bosnian Muslims. In
that war-ravaged area, where U. S. troops are now stationed,
attempting to stop the chronic fighting between ethnic and
religious groups, much of the controversy has to do with
differences in "religious" beliefs between three main
rigidly "doctrinal" groups: the
Roman-Catholic "Christians", the Orthodox-Catholic
"Christians", and the Muslims. In addition, now, the
largely-Protestant United States has interjected itself
between those three European "religious" groups -- those
"church-groups" that are willing to kill each other,
because of a variation in their doctrinal
beliefs. Furthermore, we must now also include the Jews, who
have always hated the Muslims (the sons of Ishmael), and who
are now called upon to help finance the war between these
different, non-Jewish "doctrinal" groups.
So now, in the Bosnian situation, we have at least five
"religious" groups (Roman Catholics, Orthodox Catholics,
Muslims, Protestants, and Jews)...... each claiming to
worship the God of Abraham.... and each claiming to have the
ultimate "truth" from God, and
about God.....and each willing to kill members of the
other "doctrinal" groups -- all in the name of what
each group has dogmatically accepted to be the one-and-only
genuine spiritual truth (which is, of course,
each group's own perception of "truth" -- a set of beliefs
that denies and excludes the spiritual
understandings of all other
doctrines).
And in the United States..... try to count the number of
"Protestant" divisions, each claiming a strangle-hold
on ultimate theological reality -- and
"truth".
So..... what does God think about all this? Which
"church" is "doctrinally" sound, in the opinion of God? Who
else's opinion matters..... that is, whose opinion other
than that of God Almighty.... really makes a difference?
Do we humans have anything at all to do with
the requirements that God has laid out for His people
("God's Doctrine")? Can we mortals mold or change God's
expectations of His accepted individuals, according to our
own worldly beliefs and understanding? Or is God
immutable, and responsive only to his own counsel and
wisdom?
I don't have all the answers. Maybe you do! But -- it is
my belief that the Almighty Creator of
the Universe is bi